Navigation Menu
Search

 

by Beeman

From AirgunArena

Jump to: navigation, search


  • Currently 4.80/5

Rating: 4.8/5 (5 votes cast)

Review this product
15 March 2009  

Things I liked: Great quality (as with all of Beeman pellets), good accuracy, doesn't over penetrate too bad and the mushroom effect is huge! Great energy transfer for hunting medium game.
Things I would have changed: Use a screw on lid!
What others should know: These pellets are huge!
Overall rating:
Value for money:
Size/Shape Distribution:

29 July 2008  

Things I liked: shape, size, and weight. very easy to finger hold and load. mushroom is very defined on impact. very humane pellet to use while hunting medium game with well placed head shot.
Things I would have changed: only the tin. need to be screw on as with all of Beeman pellets.
What others should know: if you are a hunter they are a must.
Overall rating:
Value for money:
Size/Shape Distribution:

23 May 2008  

Things I liked: The 25 cal crow magnum will knot down any small game within 30 yd very hard hitting pellet on contact. The expansion cup pro form as expected.
Things I would have changed: Nothing
What others should know: Try the Crow Magnum you will love the contact it will give on contact, there just no better pellet for my money.
Overall rating:
Value for money:
Size/Shape Distribution:

13 November 2007  

Things I liked: Excellent expansion and fair down range grouping
Things I would have changed: Not much.
What others should know: It does it's job. As expected at Airgun velocities its performance begins to drop off beyond 30 yd's due to its large expansion cup. But you want the large expansion cup. So Inside 30yds it almost doubles in size on impact at the sacrifice of losing some range. Nothing is for free. If you are shooting critters inside of 30yds not much is better. If you are just shooting paper go with kodiaks for the same price.
Overall rating:
Value for money:
Size/Shape Distribution:

11 October 2007  

Things I liked: Excellent for one shot critter kill.
Things I would have changed: 
What others should know: 
Overall rating:
Value for money:
Size/Shape Distribution:

(first | last) View (previous 5) (next 5) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)